Thursday, March 22, 2012

Report SCT 4.0 RC


Thank you all who came. The people were not so many as expected. The new place was pretty decent, despite the smaller size. This is a positive thing - people will stop being late. I was told that many were at the show. Internet-Ukraine,. and could not take the time to. crash Test of. (and just in time for Crash Test started coming news of an extraordinary. final exhibition. Good that we are not affected ).



First made ​​by Pasha was sitting ( in the comments he left his position ), who gave an overview of payment systems on the market, and described the cases for which payment systems which are suitable. In general, went well, sorry that he had to leave immediately after his speech. I think the questions he would suffer.



After him, the representative of Privat and told more about the payment system. Leekpai.



After the presentation of projects started.



Hoummani. were the most trained guys, reported very good and have a sufficient number of questions from the audience. If not for a few weak points, I would have made ​​to the section ... But, in general, the project is a very strong.



Financial Algorithms. Of course, weaker. Instead, the presentation of the project turned out to tredingu Lecture, 20 minutes, they did not even get to the bottom of the project. Hall responded vyalenko that due to the fact that experts in the subject area a little present.



The final draft was presented Web Passport. As for me as a good project, maybe even better than the rest, but unfortunately, the speaker was weak and not able to demonstrate the strengths of the project, and even my attempts to help the speaker did not save the situation.



Results:.



a. If the committee decides to fix the format, it will remain. During the week we will meet and discuss.



2. Projects must be prepared. So, to do full-time appointment with them before and at least listen to the presentation and make recommendations on it.

No comments:

Post a Comment